The toxicity of pesticides increased worldwide between 2013 to 2019, with Brazil among the countries leading the way. This conclusion was made in a study published in the journal Science (Wolfram et al., 2026) and contradicts the goal of reducing pesticide risks by 2030, established at the 15th United Nations Conference on Biodiversity (COP15).
In their analysis, “German scientists from the University of Kaiserslautern-Landau examined 625 pesticides across 201 nations. They used the total applied toxicity (TAT) indicator, which considers the volume used and the toxicity level of each substance.”
The authors reported in their published results that, “Six out of eight species groups are most vulnerable to increasing levels of toxicity – terrestrial arthropods (such as insects, arachnids, and centipedes), whose toxicity has surged by 6.4 percent per year; soil organisms (4.6%), fish (4.4%), aquatic invertebrates (2.9%), pollinators (2.3%), and terrestrial plants (1.9%).”
“Global TAT sank only for aquatic plants (−1.7%) and terrestrial vertebrates (−0.5% per year). Humans are part of the latter.”
“The increasing global TAT trends pose a challenge to achieving the UN pesticide risk reduction target and demonstrate the presence of threats to biodiversity globally,” the study reads.” (Cardoso, 2026; Wolfram et al., 2026)
Brazil in the spotlight
“Brazil appears as one of the main actors in this scenario. The study identifies the country as having one of the highest levels of toxicity per agricultural area on the planet – alongside China, Argentina, the US, and Ukraine.” (Cardoso, 2026)

“Furthermore, Brazil, China, the US, and India together account for 53 to 68 percent of the total applied toxicity worldwide.”
“Brazil’s relevance is directly linked to the weight of its agribusiness, especially extensive crops. Even though traditional cereals and fruits occupy large areas, the toxicity associated with crops such as soybeans, cotton, and corn has a significantly greater impact if one bears in mind their cultivated area.” (Cardoso, 2026; Wolfram et al., 2026)
Types of pesticides
“One of the most relevant findings of the study indicates that the problem is highly concentrated – on average, only 20 pesticides per country account for more than 90 percent of the total applied toxicity.”
“The study points out that different chemical classes dominate the impacts. Classes of insecticides – such as pyrethroids and organophosphates – contributed over 80 percent of the TAT of aquatic invertebrates, fish, and terrestrial arthropods. Neonicotinoids, organophosphates, and lactones accounted for more than 80 percent of the TAT of pollinators.” (Cardoso, 2026; Wolfram et al., 2026)
“Organophosphates, along with other classes of insecticides, contributed most to the TATs of terrestrial vertebrates. Acetamide and bipyridyl herbicides contributed more than 80 percent to the TAT of aquatic plants, while a broader mix of herbicides (including acetamide, sulfonylurea, and others) determined the TAT of terrestrial plants. High-volume herbicides such as acetochlor, paraquat, and glyphosate belong to these classes and have been associated with environmental and human health risks.”
“Conazole and benzimidazole fungicides, along with neonicotinoid insecticides applied to seed coatings, contributed mainly to the TAT of soil organisms.” (Cardoso, 2026; Wolfram et al., 2026)
Distant global target
“The study also assessed the progress of 65 nations. The diagnosis is that, without structural changes, only one country will achieve the UN target of reducing pesticide toxicity by 50 percent by 2030 – Chile.”
“According to the researchers, China, Japan, and Venezuela are on track to achieve the target and show downward trends across all indicators. However, they need to speed up changes in pesticide use.”
“Thailand, Denmark, Ecuador, and Guatemala are moving away from the target, with at least one indicator doubling in the last 15 years. They need to reverse the rapid increase trends and return to their previous trajectory.” (Cardoso, 2026; Wolfram et al., 2026)
“All other countries in the study, including Brazil, need to bring pesticide risks back to levels seen more than 15 years ago. This means reversing decades-old patterns of use in both volume and toxicity of mixtures.”
“The scientists point to three main ways to curb the escalating risks – replacing highly toxic pesticides, expanding organic farming, and adopting non-chemical alternatives. Biological control technologies, agricultural diversification, and more precise management are named as strategies capable of cutting down impacts without hurting productivity.” (Cardoso, 2026; Wolfram et al., 2026)
Organic Farming to Promote the Achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs).

The United Nations (UN) introduced the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a comprehensive framework for poverty eradication, environmental conservation and sustainable agriculture, with the vision of ensuring prosperity for all by 2030. Organic farming can facilitate the achievement of the UN SDGs in numerous ways. (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)
First, “Organic agriculture improves ecosystem and soil fertility. Organic agriculture relies on natural processes, biodiversity, and local ecosystem functions [SDG #15] without the use of synthetic chemicals or genetically modified organisms. Organic agriculture also employs environmentally friendly practices such as crop rotation, organic manures (compost and manure), and biological control for minimal human-related damage to the environment.” (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)

Second, for the eradication of poverty [SDG #1], organic farming generates labor employment in agriculture and rural jobs. “For zero hunger and food security [SDG #2], organic agriculture approaches ensure sustainable agroecosystems that ensure long-term food supply. Organic agriculture ensures healthy and safe food by non-use of agrochemicals.” (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)

Third, “Organic farming enhances economic security and promotes education [SDG #4] in sustainable agriculture, environmental management, and rural development for quality education.”
Fourth, regarding gender equity [SDG #5], organic farming creates employment for women in rural areas and empowers them economically through fair remuneration and improved family welfare. (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)
Fifth, “Organic farming aids in clean water and sanitation [SDG #6] by preventing nutrient runoffs and reducing releases of pollutants, thereby improving drinking water and aquatic ecosystem quality. It also improves the effectiveness of water use through improved retention of soil water.” (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)
And sixth, “In the area of clean and affordable energy [SDG #7], organic farming utilizes renewable energy sources and biomass recycling to generate energy, minimizing fossil fuel usage and improving energy sustainability.”
Seventh, “Organic agriculture contributes to decent work and economic growth [SDG #8] through improved labor standards and connecting small-scale farmers to fair supply chains and niche markets.
Eighth, in the area of industry, innovation, and infrastructure [SDG #9], organic farming enhances competitiveness, post-harvest handling, and infrastructural development.” (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)
Ninth, “Organic farming reduces inequalities [SDG #10] by enabling poor and small-scale farmers to access global markets, leading to a more equitable distribution of income.
Tenth, organic farming promotes sustainable cities and communities [SDG #11] as well as responsible consumption and production [SDG #12] through ethically oriented consumption that drives socially and environmentally conscious demand, underpinning local food systems that reduce waste and enhance resilience.
Eleventh, “Organic farming is at the center of climate action [SDG #13] through the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and building ecosystem resilience through methods like cover cropping and agroforestry.”
Twelfth, “For aquatic life [SDG # 14], organic farming discourages chemical pollution.” (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)
Thirteenth, organic farming is also a cause of peace, justice, and good institutions [SDG #16] through the encouragement of partnership and community-based programs. The benefits are achieved in partnerships [SDG #17] for objectives, such as collaborative efforts between governments, NGOs, private enterprises, and farmer groups.
“Lastly, organic agriculture provides an integrated solution for sustainable agriculture [SDG #2] to address poverty, hunger, health, gender equity, environmentally friendly agriculture, and climate change simultaneously. If enacted as a universal strategy, it has the potential to strengthen the SDGs’ transformative agenda and contribute to making a healthier and more equitable world.” (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)
Although organic farming has benefits, it is also faced with many challenges. To make proper use of its potential in driving the UN SDGs, increased investment in research, extension, farmer training, policy influence, and consumer promotion through labeling and education is important.” (Kioumarsi et al., 2025)
References
Wolfram J, Bussen D, Bub S, Petschick LL, Herrmann LZ, Schulz R. Increasing applied pesticide toxicity trends counteract the global reduction target to safeguard biodiversity. Science. 2026;391(6785):616-621. doi: 10.1126/science.aea8602.
Cardoso R. Pesticides have become more harmful globally, study finds. Agência Brasil. February 23, 2026. Available at: https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/meio-ambiente/noticia/2026-02/pesticides-have-become-more-harmful-globally-study-finds
Kioumarsi H, Alidoust M, Özbey, BG. Organic farming to promote the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Springer Nature Research Communities. 2025. Available at: https://communities.springernature.com/posts/organic-farming-to-promote-the-achievement-of-the-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs

























